I
hate to get too predictable, but you can imagine how I responded when I saw the
following in a recent advert from Paternoster Press:
James
McClendon is right to assert that Theology is ‘not merely a reading strategy by
which the church can understand Scripture; it is a way—for us, it is the way—of
Christian existence itself’.
Disclaimers:
(1) I do not know where James McClendon says this, therefore I do not have a
larger context for interpreting what “theology” means here. (2) I do not know
who this “us” is of whom he speaks.
Let
me also say, first and foremost, that there are some ways that I can see myself
affirming this sentence. If by “theology” you mean, “Jesus, the crucified
Messiah, is resurrected Lord,” then I agree that this mini-narrative of
Christian theology provides both the hermeneutical lens for making sense of
scripture and provides us with the way of Christian existence itself.
If
this is the life of Christ, after all, then we who are dubbed “little Christs”
are called to renarrate this life in our own.
But
of course, my concern is that this is not what the phrase means at all.
My concern
is that it has taken a typical Evangelical mistake (relying on the Bible as
though the Bible is THE thing, rather than Christ being THE thing) and pushed
it back one further level from the appropriate target, landing on Christian
theological articulations as THE things that determine faithful Christian faith
and practice.
“The
way,” of course, is Jesus.
The
Bible testifies to Jesus as the way God has provided for the life of God’s
creatures. It is one step removed from the person and his narrative, but is the
access we have and the God-given interpretation of the saving story.
Theology
in the traditional sense is a second step removed, as it reflects on what the
Bible has said about Jesus who is the way and the God who provided Him.
If
I’m reading the paragraph fairly, the claim that theology is the way of
Christian existence is a door to a world in which theology forms the
hermeneutic, identity, and praxis of a community. In such a world, articulating
the correct theology becomes its own good–the very faithful practice God hopes
for from Christians.
If
theology is the way of Christian life itself, then mental constructions and
statements of right belief become the markers of Christian life. And in so
doing, following Christ along the way of the cross, being ambassadors of the
message of reconciliation, feeding the hungry, caring for the parentless,
embracing the outsider–all of these become second-order responses, and lie far
from the center of faithful Christian practice.
But
perhaps we can just agree (hard as it is for my inner 8 to say such a thing):
The
theology by which we understand scripture is that Jesus is God’s messiah, given
up on the cross and then raised and enthroned at God’s right hand.
This
theology of the Christ is our way of life, because it means that all of our
life should be a giving up of ourselves in order that all creation might live
under the freedom of the risen Christ’s lordship.
Now
that’s a “theology as the way of Christian existence” I can get behind–a
theology in which theology itself is eclipsed by the Christ of whom it speaks.
Descoberto em Storied Theology.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário